Transcript - S3 Ep3: Piano +1

Intro:

This is Mission: Commission [intro]

Melissa Smey:

This is Mission: Commission, a podcast where we demystify the process of how classical music gets made. 

I’m your host, Melissa Smey, and I’m the Artistic Director of Miller Theatre at Columbia University in New York City.

On this show, I’ve commissioned three composers to write new works of classical music - and to do it in just 6 weeks. 

This is week 3 - the halfway point in our journey. For this commission, the composers are writing a piece for piano and one other instrument. And in this episode, we’ll go – sometimes literally – inside the piano. 

Let’s start with Ann Cleare and hear an excerpt from her audio diary.  

Ann Cleare:

Hi, everyone. Ann here. And I am back at my desk after a busy few days of grading papers and compositions. The time away from working on the piece did give me a bit of space to think about how to proceed this week and over the next weeks. It also gave me a chance, just in the small pockets of time I had, to look into some sources that have been inspiring to me. So some of the sources are kind of more scientific, some are anthropological, some are more artistic. 

Melissa Smey:

Well, hello there, Ann.

Ann Cleare:

Hi, Melissa. 

Melissa Smey:

So, interesting in something that we heard in your audio diary this week about how scientific you might want to be – is that something that you find yourself asking a lot?

Ann Cleare:

I think I do because I think when I describe to a lot of people that I'm doing that, that this is the kind of process that I'm undertaking to make a piece, a lot of people think it must be kind of scientific then – that it must be some kind of translation of the science of the place. The starting point where I'm trying to find inspiration, I like to think about, kind of different ways of looking at a place I should say. 

So if it is maybe more the way a scientist would look at it and look for how a place behaves in terms of maybe a scientific perspective. And then to think about it in different ways, maybe the way an engineer would look at it. The way it's built, maybe like a building if it was something like that, or a tool of some kind. Generally, we all have very different connections with different places, with different forces of nature. So there’s a whole kind of perceptual realm as well and what we feel as humans. And then of course there's the whole idea of what the place might feel itself. So I suppose at this stage, I'm kind of trying to look at it from all those different perspectives so that I hopefully end up making something that maybe doesn't completely depend on one angle, one of those angles, but kind of borrows from them all. That would be, I think, the ideal for me.

So I'm back by the tree and I'm going to record for a second time, and this time, I'm going to try two different ways of recording. The first one is kind of a static way of recording in that I'm going to place the mics as well as I can. And I'm also going to try a different microphone as well as the one I had last week. And then I'm going to record in a very different way.

When I replace the mic in the first way of recording, I'm going to be as quiet as I can be – just try and let the microphone absorb as much of the sound as possible. And then in the second way of recording, I'm going to move around with the microphone, almost like an instrument that's performing the space. So I'll have two very different recordings and see how these come out. But I do think the recordings this week are going to be quite different, not just because of these different techniques, but also just being here now. The weather is so different today. I mean, it's mild and warmer, a brighter day, whereas last week it was snowing. I'm also thinking, you know, this process over the next weeks when I write the piece, it's also really going to mark winter moving into spring. That could possibly relate to how material transforms throughout the piece because I really do love processes of change, very incremental change and feeling that in music.

Melissa Smey:

Listening this week, you can hear that it was more active. You can hear there are a lot of birds. And so, then you were talking about the idea of the progression of nature, and the idea that that’s something that you might put into the piece, this idea of a process of incremental change. 

And so, I love the idea that a listener could take that, have that same experience with music. And so, if you could talk to us a bit about how you think about a process of incremental change, I’d love to hear about that.

Ann Cleare:

Yeah, it was amazing how different it was there. Not just even… very different to my ears there. And then listening to the recordings, they're actually so much more difficult to analyze in a way because there's a lot more activity. 

So I'm back in my studio reviewing some of the material that I recorded today. Like if I compare maybe even just a sound from the earth between the two weeks – so this would be last week's, [sound]

and then this week's. [other sounds]

Yeah, this week's is so much fuller, as you can hear. Now, I will say I've filtered out some of the microphone sound, and I guess there's a focus on the tones that are in there. So yeah, this would be a kind of active use of the microphone. And it sounds something like this at the moment. [sound]

I don’t know if you could hear that oscillating… You know, I'm moving the microphone as gently as I can so that the cable doesn't cause too much interference. And basically, it's almost like a vibrato in a way, but with the microphone moving through the air. 

One of the earth, but this would be kind of moving the microphone or the geophone very, um, gently when it's in the ground. [sound]

Wow, there's a lovely high tone. So that would be some movement. I don't know if you can hear that fluctuation. It's like “wah wah wah wah wah wah.” So that's just with a rubber percussion mallet that I have, and I place that on the geophone, and I really gently, slowly move it. 

Melissa Smey:

Ok, well, so you've got your second set of field recordings by the trees. And in terms of the progress of our time together, we're just about at halfway through our six-week progress, which is really hard to imagine, no pressure.

Ann Cleare:

Oh wow. I’m not having a panic attack. [laughs]

Melissa Smey:

Nope, no panic attack. So it seems that soon you'll probably start linking this to piano material. And so, there's another technical topic I wanted to talk about with you, with the goal of kind of demystifying things for listeners, which is the idea of prepared piano. And to help people kind of understand what even is prepared piano. And so, I'd love for you to talk a bit about that, either what it means broadly, but maybe more relevant, what it means for you and your work.

Ann Cleare:

Yeah, I guess it is a funny term, isn't it? Prepared. I would say, in general, there is either prepared piano or playing on the inside strings of the piano. 

[piano strings strummed harmonically]

There is a lot of that in my work with writing for piano. And I think a lot of that relates to working with this, kind of environmental material that doesn't really fit into tonality very well. And the piano is such a tonal instrument, you know, it's really all about the diatonic chromatic harmony –

[scale slowly played on the piano]

– because traditionally, it's played on the keys. And then, you know, when I go out and record the tree or the earth or whatever, it just doesn't map onto those keys very well at all, maybe in a few slight instances.

So for me it's, I suppose, about the material that becomes of interest to me in the beginning of a piece. Then I have to find a way to translate that onto an instrument. And because the piano is so chromatic and not really microtonal at all, I can't really get to the frequencies between the chromaticism, which is where I need to get to really, and say with a string instrument, you know, it's much easier to get there because you're sliding along the strings and all those frequencies are there.

[string instrument plays glissandi]

It's not always easy to find them, but they're far more accessible than on the piano.

I mean, when you think of a piano, as you say, it's such a huge instrument, but it's made of all kinds of materials too. Like I think, when you look into it and you see all the inside strings, you just can't help but wanting to play them, I think. [laughs]

[piano string plucked and sustained]

I often think, you know, for the audience, it's a shame they don't get to see the inside of the piano more because I think they might understand why it's, it's actually so hard to resist going in there. [laughs]

It also, it's just such a different sound world in there. I mean, they're almost really like two different instruments, the keys,

[chromatic scale descending on the piano]

and then the inside strings. 

[piano strings strummed up and down the full range]

And what I'm really feeling with the piano is that, you know, it's so hard to create a sustain on a piano, like a true sustain, because it's like the minute you strike a key, it immediately starts to decay.

You know, you can't actually really hold a sustain on the piano acoustically, whereas I think preparation can help you a bit with that as well, or at least a combination of playing on the keys and inside the piano. So that's often, I think, a reason that it comes into play for me as well, is trying to keep the piano sound for a little bit longer; sustain it for a little bit longer.

[theme]

Melissa Smey:

Good. Well, this seems like a nice place for us to pause. Thanks again, Ann.

Ann Cleare:

Thanks, Melissa.

Melissa Smey:

Our next composer is Wang Lu.

Well, hello there, Lu. How are you?

Wang Lu:

Good, how are you, Melissa?

Melissa Smey:

I'm good. I'm delighted to chat with you. What's so interesting is that you've had a remarkably busy week. I want to talk first about those diaries and then talk about, you know, big picture, where the piece is. So we kind of unpack those audio diaries, and so you’ve got four of them. And, the first two are piano improvisations –

[AUDIO DIARY – PIANO IMPROV]

 

–     and that's on the piano in your office. Is that right?

Wang Lu:

That's right. It's a bit out of tune. Yeah.

Melissa Smey:

Yeah. And it's funny, I feel like you can almost hear that the keys are a little bit old. You can tell that it is not a youthful instrument there. And you had said that it was from 1913. [laughs]

Wang Lu:

Yeah. I'm just thinking, maybe the quality of that you just heard, the oldness of the piano, becomes part of my imagination. If one day it’s played on a beautiful new Steinway, and we go, “Oh, that's not the piece.” [laughs] So, I don’t know.

[AUDIO DIARY CONT. – PIANO IMPROV]

Melissa Smey:

Well so, is there anything that you would like to share about the two improvs that you recorded?

Wang Lu:

Yeah. Very likely they're not going to make it anywhere but feel free to use them. [laughs] I think it’s very – I almost feel like I'm doing a surgery on myself and showing you, like, showing the audio diaries like that. It's like I cut myself open. And it's, uh, the skin and the fat. And then, you know, everything you wouldn't show. I think for those improvisations, I was still thinking about vocal music.

[AUDIO DIARY CONT. – PIANO IMPROV]

So I kept the range in the more closed structured chord.

[AUDIO DIARY CONT. – PIANO IMPROV]

Like vocal music, I like the out of tune-ness. I kept the pedal down. So imagine the chorus singing, right? Because the human voices are not equal tempered. 

[AUDIO DIARY CONT. – PIANO IMPROV]

And then I have this chord progression that moves and, um, has this kind of lyricism to it. But also, I'm interested – and again, it's a resonance that's being out of tune and building over time. And then I decided, as I was playing, to try to stick to the theme because then anything could go. So I spread the theme around the piano. Just as I was thinking, okay, what can I do with it? Is it worth doing it? It just, you know, and then I watched how habitually I moved my hands, and it's like, this is good or bad, but this is my habit. Okay, let's not move that in the next one. So yeah, those are the things.

[AUDIO DIARY CONT. – PIANO IMPROV]

And I took the same chords and I gave to Russell, and asked him to send me a recording, um, of tryouts. Right. He recorded from the studio, on very soft mallets.

[AUDIO DIARY – VIBRAPHONE DEMO]

Maybe not very soft mallets, but [it] sounds more soft so you don't hear the attack. Again, it's thinking about vocal music. 

[AUDIO DIARY – MARIMBA DEMO]

So I asked him to play very soft on the… maybe roll or something to make the rounded sound – the clouds of sound instead of ding-ding-ding.

Melissa Smey:

There's definitely something that's in common with those is this kind of resonance and that you're kind of searching for sounds and searching for different qualities in sound. So here's a conceptual question I would love for you to consider. You're searching, and so, you're searching for the piece. Is it also though that then the sounds find you, and so then the piece finds you and how does it come together? How do those two things meet in the middle, so to speak?

Wang Lu:

Yeah. Um, that's a great question because composers like myself imagine, “Oh, I have this concept.” There's this memory that's a blurry memory of something very vivid. So there's out of tune-ness and the resonance, oh, I'm going to go look for the resonance, right? Look for the blend of the thing that could most accurately translate my imagination. But as you said, exactly – as I was searching for it, always pleasant surprises happen because the sound in your head is not the sound in reality.

And the combinations and all the subtlety would always bring me surprises in terms of sound and choreography too. So, what if I love the sound and I don't mind the awkwardness of the body? I still can't move the chords, so it's a balance, right? So the piece started to ask me questions, you see? Why do I want to use this marimba and vibraphone and piano? The original idea is about this – if we're not changing the idea – is about this kind of out-of-focus memory, but it's not like you're losing your memory. You're trying to focus and see through the window, or maybe a foggy window, something in your memory. An image that is very warm, but then you stop, you're like, “Okay, maybe pitched gongs also work,” you see?

And then I thought about, something about duet. I really love this proposal you give to me is “Piano Plus”. We talked about this. I associate piano with loneliness too. Piano plus one – it's really wonderful. I don't want the percussionist to be far away and to struggle and to try to cue, and the pianist has to read all the meter changes and trying to find a time so they can be together. I think there should be a very intimate connection on stage that the audience can feel it's like a kindred spirit. You know, the choreography of that is very important. You know, they have connections.

Then I thought about this term just now. In Chinese, it's called [speaks Mandarin]. Basically, it's like the harmonicity, the harmoniousness performed by two people. So there's this connection through timbre, but through understanding each other. 

Melissa Smey:

That's beautiful. 

Wang Lu:

It's like improvisers, right? If you have a band, then you improvise with them. And I want them to have a connection. I don't want to be a composer that's in the middle of two people. I am in the middle of a married couple. I'm not trying to say, “Okay, you do that, daddy, and you do that, mommy,” and that’s terrible! I don’t want my piece to like disrupt their connection, their musicality. These are such well-established and trained and experienced musical people, right? If they want to breathe here and my score says, “No, there's a 1/16 bar right there; you're going to catch that.” I go, “Oh no!” I think about all of that. So, you're right. The piece – hopefully, the piece is not in the way of their musical marriage, you know.

Melissa Smey:

That's really lovely. I've never heard anyone describe it that way before. I really like that description. Well, so I want to ask you a follow up because I think that for listeners, if a listener can understand the mystery of the sound that they are hearing and how it's made, then they can have better insight into the piece, and they actually can have a better connection to the piece. And sometimes, particularly with contemporary music, there are unusual sounds and combinations of instruments. And so, it's not just that, you know, you're playing the piano by depressing the keys, or that you're playing the violin with the bow. And so, you have some nice illustrations of different techniques in your third audio diary where you're playing inside the piano. 

And you know, for me, I trained as a musician and I've listened to lots and lots of concerts, but listening to it only as audio, I have just a guess of what I think that you are doing. But without the visual, there's some mystery even for me. And so, I thought I'd love to ask you to tell us a little bit about what you were doing there. Like, there's some tapping to start.

[AUDIO DIARY – PLAYING INSIDE THE PIANO]

and then there's a rhythm change and there's some different sounds. And so can you tell me just a little bit about what you were doing when you made that recording?

[AUDIO DIARY CONT. – PLAYING INSIDE THE PIANO]

Wang Lu:

Yeah. And this is me having both my hands inside the piano – left hand kind of muffling the strings in the high register, and right hand just running fingers tapping. 

[AUDIO DIARY CONT. – PLAYING INSIDE THE PIANO]

And it is in no way that's finalized or anything. I was just trying to get to try things, which I don't normally go inside piano at all because I respect the piano. I don't want to damage the piano. It is very rare. The purpose of possibly going inside the piano is, again, inside the piano as a connecting point in terms of sound and the physical position between the percussionist and the pianist. 

So the pianist will be sitting there playing the keys. The percussionist could be playing percussion very close to piano, and then walk to the piano very closely to play inside the piano. And the pianist could stand up and play inside the piano while the percussion is moving back to the percussion. So inside the piano, in terms of sound and action is where they connect.

And so I’m trying to find sounds that connect to the keyboard sound – the key sound – to the pitched percussion or resonating percussion. So I’m looking for the sound; that’s why I was doing that inside. And also looking for something, you know, more, more intricate and thinking about blurry image, a foggy image, maybe rains and, you know, stuff like that. Yeah.

[theme music]

Melissa Smey:

Well, Lu, I think that's a good place for us to pause. What a lovely conversation we've had today. Thank you as always for making the time.

Wang Lu:

Oh, thank you so much. Yeah. Now the clock is ticking for next week.

Melissa Smey:

No, it hasn't started yet. You have the whole afternoon to do anything you like.

Wang Lu:

[laughs]

Melissa Smey:

Our next composer is Miguel Zenón.

Hello there. Welcome back. So how has this week been for you?

Miguel Zenón:

It's been good, productive. You know, I've been putting a lot of stuff down. I use Finale a lot, you know? To, uh – during the process. And I pretty much do it, like, on every single piece that I write.

Melissa Smey:

Nice.

Miguel Zenón:

So I started inputting a few things, a few of those early ideas, those chords, and then like a melody that goes through those chords, and then those chords modulate, and the melody kind of continues.

[AUDIO DIARY – FINALE PLAYBACK OF MIGUEL’S DRAFT]

And I feel like now, once I start doing that, I'm usually sort of like on a roll. So I feel like I'm on a roll. [laughs]

Melissa Smey:

Yay. And I'm curious, did that – did you put that in once you got back? Or were you still on the road?

Miguel Zenón:

No, no. I did that, I did that on a plane on one of those – on a plane ride, and it was… So that's the thing – for me, there's sort of like a split-out process. One process is like the creative, which I have to be on a piano; I have to be in a quiet place. And then there's this process of like inputting things, which I can pretty much do anywhere.

[AUDIO DIARY CONT. – FINALE PLAYBACK]

Melissa Smey:

It's so fun and exciting to hear that audio diary and to see how already you've transformed those chords. And like okay, what’s coming next? And literally that's right when the guitar comes in, so it's exciting to hear it.

[AUDIO DIARY CONT. – FINALE PLAYBACK]

Miguel Zenón:

Yeah. I think what I sent is sort of like just the chords and the theme. And then now, the thing you haven't heard, but I'm – the thing, the stuff that I'm inputting now is more of a rhythmic kind of thing that eventually is going to lead into an open improv. 

Melissa Smey:

Good. Well, so I want to switch gears just a little bit and ask you about the piano itself, right? Because the creative brief that we had set for this season of the podcast was the idea of Piano Plus One. And, um, I mean, the piano is so iconic, right? And lots of people have experience with piano lessons as a kid, and there's piano in lots of different kinds of music. And so, I'm curious if you can unpack for us, what's your relationship with the piano?

Miguel Zenón:

Well, in terms of writing music of late, I write almost exclusively on the piano. Between the piano and, and, you know, notation software. And I'm a saxophonist, but I never write on the saxophone, like ever. Maybe, one-two percent of the time. But, you know, I'm not really proficient on the instrument at all. As a matter of fact, I have traumatic memories of like learning the piano in school and going through like these piano labs, and being really, just like horrible at it, and just having the worst time. Like, I remember being in school and like, you know, you go through these things where you have to play some inversions and you have to play some scales and use the specific kind of fingering.

And it was just, it was really torture for me. So I kind of fell in love with the instrument, just from writing, you know? Like trying to figure stuff out on the instrument writing things. And also from teaching; I use it a lot to teach. And I've become a little more, not proficient, but like a little more comfortable over the years because I use it a lot to play along with folks and, you know, if I'm teaching a lesson, so I play along with the students. So that's been helpful. But it's taken a while for me to [laughs] find something that works.

Melissa Smey:

Yes. I have a similarly difficult relationship with the piano. I trained as a flute player, and so I think somehow maybe it's about being a woodwind player – I don't know – because I didn't play piano as a kid. And so, the translation of going from like a melodic line to having to use everything to play all of the notes [laughs].

Miguel Zenón:

Yeah. But then again, as a composition tool, it’s the perfect tool, I feel.

Melissa Smey:

Yeah.

Miguel Zenón:

You know, it has the harmonic thing. It has the potent kind of sound. And you can have something that's melodic and really have it shine and, and it's really super percussive and rhythmic. 

Melissa Smey:

Yeah. Well, and what's interesting about that is that, you're writing for such diverse instrumentation. So is there anything that you can tell us about how you then translate obviously what must be in your head, right? Like this idea of the piece, and it's kind of in your head, and it's coming to you through the medium of the piano, but then it's for big band, or it's for, you know, guitar and piano. How does that, how does that come through the filter of your brain and then into a piece?

Miguel Zenón:

Yeah, that's a great question. Actually, so yeah, it is a challenge, for sure. But I think, uh, over time, I’ve sort of found a way of disconnecting or saying, “Okay, so this is the information and I have it in this medium, which is the piano.” And now, when I translate it here, I have to think about how to make it work in that context. So it's, you know, it's not always that you can just grab it and put it there. As a matter of fact, most of the time that doesn't work. [laughs]

Melissa Smey:

That's right. No, the kind of, the idiomatic translation for whatever the instrument that will be playing it will be. That's kind of like the hidden magic that we're trying to illuminate in the conversations like this.

Miguel Zenón:

Yeah. And I feel specifically, if you're a proficient pianist, it's especially challenging because then you're used to like putting things down a certain way and then working. And then once you translate them to like an orchestra or a big band or a string quartet, then it just sounds like a bunch of chords just moving in parallel and then doesn't really – yeah. So I think it is especially challenging if you're a good pianist.

Melissa Smey:

[laughs] So true. So true. And interesting the way that different composers have some, you know, some want to write on paper – that each composer is completely different in terms of how they are working. So, it's nice to hear for you that it's based in the piano.

I want to ask a question about notation. You mentioned that working in Finale, and it helps to kind of figure out the piece and thinking about the ways in which you have to transmit all of your ideas for the piece and the communication about the piece to the musicians. And then they will be the ones who will convey it to listeners. And tell us a bit about how you approach that, and how do you translate the complex rhythms that are kind of embedded in your DNA and that, you know, just so intrinsic to who you are, and now you have to find a way to convey them to the musicians who are then going to convey them to an audience. Practically speaking, how does that work?

Miguel Zenón:

Yeah, yeah. I'm somewhat picky about notation. I mean, I'm not as picky as some other folks are. But I'm very picky about, you know, precision, like rhythmic precision. I've had this conversation with a lot of folks in the past about, you know, how… especially, when there's going to be improvisation and things that sort of open the door to creativity from the performance.

It’s like how specific do you want to be, versus, you know, how much do you want to leave that door open? And, um, I feel like I'm going to be as specific as I want the music to be. If I want something to be there in a very, very specific way– if I want a specific voicing or if I want a very, very specific rhythm, I'm going to write what I hear, and I'm sort of going to expect the music to give that back to me. For the sections that are improvised, usually when we improvise in this context, there's always going to be some kind of structure or parameter or series of chords, or a series of bars or – you know, I could just give them like a little guideline or something like that.

But for the stuff that's notated and composed, I'm going to be very specific. And you know, I mean that poses certain challenges, of course. Because when you're writing, when you open the door to things that have a certain level of difficulty and require a certain level of precision, then that requires more practice time. And it requires a very specific type of musicians. And we talked about Matt and Miles before, and the reason why I thought that they were sort of fit for what I had in mind. I do spend a lot of time thinking about it and making sure that what's coming out of here is what's being put on paper so it translates well.

Melissa Smey:

Yeah. And when you're working on new music, like a new piece, how much rehearsal time do you want? Like, what does the preparation look like? Because you think about if – you've played with like your set ensemble, right? Your quartet has been your quartet for years, and so you know each other so well. And like, the example I always use in like, kind of traditional classical music is like a string quartet, right? And they'll play, they'll hone their interpretation of Beethoven over a fifteen-year career. And with music that is brand new, the idea that maybe if we're lucky, we're getting a, like a good reading, and it's harder to find the space and the time for like, a beautiful interpretation. And so when you're making new music, what is it that you're looking for in the preparation process with the musicians?

Miguel Zenón:

Yeah. A lot of that has to do with the musicians themselves. And the reason why I choose to play with certain people is that I know that they're going to put in the time, more than the rehearsal. The rehearsal’s important, of course, rehearsing together, yes. But individual preparation for me is key. Because that's really what, how you take advantage of the rehearsal and really build the music. Everything else is like, you know, there's a saying among us musicians: like, you practice at home; you don't go to the rehearsal to practice.

Melissa Smey:

Yes. 

Miguel Zenón:

You show up prepared, so when we get to the rehearsal, you're making music, you're not practicing. So that’s the idea.

Melissa Smey:

Yeah. Well, so we're just about halfway through our process together. This is kind of week three. We have a six-week process. So I'm curious, how are you feeling about the next three weeks to come?

Miguel Zenón:

I'm feeling okay. I feel like, I was saying earlier, I'm kind of like in a groove now where I'm, I feel like I'm putting out a lot of information, and usually for me, when that happens, it's sort of a good sign that things are going to progress, you know, at a good pace. 

 

You know, I don't like to be kind of pushed into deadlines. So I like to kind of work on the early side in case things need to get tweaked or, you know, to have enough time to put the parts together and make sure everything looks nice and all that. So, um, I'm feeling okay. You know, I mean, [laughs] of course you never know; anything could happen. But best-case scenario right now, everything is flowing. Flowing nice.

Melissa Smey:

Nice. Yeah. Well, I so appreciate you saying yes and being part of this journey with us because it's really, really fun talking with you and having these insights as you're making this new piece. Yeah.

Miguel Zenón:

It’s my pleasure.

[theme music]

Melissa Smey:

Mission: Commission is a production of Miller Theatre at Columbia University.

Major support for Mission: Commission is provided by the Francis Goelet Charitable Lead Trusts. Support for Miller Theatre is provided by the New York State Council on the Arts and the Howard Gilman Foundation. 

Additional support is provided by the National Endowment for the Arts. Support for contemporary music at Miller Theatre is provided by the Aaron Copland Fund for Music and the Amphion Foundation.

This episode was produced by Golda Arthur and me, with Adrienne Stortz, Lauren Cognetti, and Taylor Riccio. Erick Gomez is our sound designer and engineer.

This episode featured audio excerpts of pieces written by Ann Cleare, Wang Lu, and Miguel Zenón.

Visit missioncommissionpodcast.com for a full listing of pieces, performers, and recordings included in this and every episode.

Thanks for listening.

 

 

Previous
Previous

S3 Ep4: Decisions, Decisions

Next
Next

S3 Ep3: Piano +1